expenditure in printing the first volume and the Chronological Table and in binding the completed Volumes.
2.
In view of the fact that it appeared from dispatch No. 414 of the 11th September, 1900 that the cost of the work would be $3549.35, it seemed to me that $2,770 was an excessive charge for the work proposed. The case was referred to Messrs. Noronha & Company, Messrs. J. Cannington explained at an interview at this office, that he had intended to propose, in his letter of the 13th October, that Messrs. Noronha and Company should be paid pro-rata for the proportion of work done by them on their original contract of about $3,569.35, and should perhaps receive a small bonus of $200 in consideration of their expenditure in special labour.
3. I accordingly telegraphed on the 29th enquiring whether Messrs. Noronha and Company would be willing to accept release from their original contract on the
expenditure in printing the first volume and the Chronological Table
and in bideig the bindung completedly Volumes.
२.
In vein of the
wap estimated
fact that it affered finger desf. No. 414 of the 11th Seftenly, 1900 that the cost of they work would be $3549.35, it sumed to me that $2,770
was
whole
an excessive.
chaye
в
for the work proposed The carved out Means. Noronha Morean Su J. Cannington exflamid
at an interview at this office, that he had intended to profore, in
his letter of the 13-4788 October, that Meson
Noronha and Company should be faid prorat for the proportion of
work don & them
on
then orignial contract
h A A
35, and
3569 should perhaps receiv a small bonus of $200 on about that amount, in consideration of thes expenditure in Special life. 3.
adening
I accordingly
telegraphed to a quer
the 29th
enquing whether
Messrs. Noronha and
Comfery would be willing to accept rehand from their origineal
contract on
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.